Leaders

No. These servers usually reward specialists: builders who execute the plan, farmers who keep supplies flowing, redstone players who automate production, scouts who map threats, traders who keep an economy alive, and PvPers who respond to calls. Leadership sets direction, but the day-to-day progress comes from members doing reliable work.

Typically: claim or plot access, container and vault permissions, who can use key infrastructure (spawners, grinders, farms), diplomacy settings like allies and enemies, whether to raid or defend, and how shared loot is stored or distributed. The exact knobs depend on the server's group system.

Look for clear rules around storage and loot, permissions that are granted gradually, and communication that persists outside fights. Groups that keep organized public chests, documented projects, and multiple trusted officers tend to survive setbacks.

Over-concentrated power and sloppy permissions. Leaders can hoard, play favorites, or vanish, and a single over-trusted member can clean out storage or sabotage claims. Healthy groups spread responsibility, protect critical resources, and make expectations explicit early.

Not necessarily. Many communities are primarily build and economy driven, with leadership focused on city planning, infrastructure, and logistics. PvP servers just make the chain of command more visible because raid timing and defense coordination matter.